A direct to consumer aligner still trading in Australia advertises $1,245. Your case is $8,000. The patient has usually seen both numbers before they reach your page, and the page has to do something about that.
SmileDirectClub is gone and several Australian imitators have folded, but at least one direct to consumer operator is still trading here at $1,245, or about $22 a fortnight, with a four to six month average duration. Against a reviewed case range of $7,000 to $12,000 that is a six to eight times gap.
The brand does not have to win the click to hurt you. It only has to have set the number in the patient's mind first, which the category's advertising has been doing for years. A page that opens with technology and credentials, without addressing that gap, is answering a question the reader is not asking.
There is also an asymmetry worth naming honestly. That operator publishes patient testimonials describing treatment and outcomes. A registered specialist orthodontist could not lawfully publish the same thing under section 133. Whether a mail order product retailer is properly caught by the same rule is genuinely unsettled and we have found no enforcement either way, but the practical effect on the page is real: your competitor may say things you may not.
A senior team that lives inside your account. Conversion infrastructure wired in before any ad goes live. Reporting that ties spend to booked appointments, not impressions.
A senior specialist who runs clinic accounts day to day.
Every keyword, headline and account structure built inside real Australian clinic accounts.
Winner, Best Google Ads Campaign, Australia 2025. Google Partner. AFR Fast 100.