Somebody in distress who books and then waits six weeks is worse off than somebody told immediately that you cannot help this month and here is who can. That is an ethical position and it is also the one that produces better clients.
Section 133 prohibits testimonials about clinical aspects of a regulated health service, and psychology is regulated under it. The rule is identical to the one binding dentists and physiotherapists. Its weight is not.
A dental patient consenting to a testimonial discloses that they had a filling. A psychology client attesting to their treatment discloses their own mental health diagnosis, publicly and permanently. And soliciting that review means asking somebody inside a therapeutic relationship, with the power imbalance that implies, to waive their own confidentiality for the practitioner's commercial benefit.
So in psychology the regulation and the ethics point the same direction, and just get more Google reviews is not neutral advice. What can be used are comments about customer service or communication style that reference no clinical aspect. That is a narrow band and it is honestly a small part of what makes a psychology page work.
A senior team that lives inside your account. Conversion infrastructure wired in before any ad goes live. Reporting that ties spend to booked appointments, not impressions.
A senior specialist who runs clinic accounts day to day.
Every keyword, headline and account structure built inside real Australian clinic accounts.
Winner, Best Google Ads Campaign, Australia 2025. Google Partner. AFR Fast 100.